Blinded by the light – when project management methodology matters more than project success
Many organisations believe (hope?) that strict adherence to a project management methodology guarantees project success. These unfortunates have been blinded by the dazzling (but false) promise of whatever methodology they choose to follow, and their projects suffer for it. My feelings on this are strong, but with good reason. I’ve seen too many projects go awry because of blind devotion to methodology.
The first step to fixing any problem is to recognise that it exists. So how can you tell if methodology has taken over your organisation? Well, here are a few warning signs:
- The focus is on following The Book rather than getting the job done: A classic sign of methodology madness is when things are done a certain way just because the process mandates it. This is sometimes seen in organisations with a strong project management office (PMO). To keep the powers that be happy, project managers often end up following the letter of the process but not the spirit, using other (informal) means to get the job done.
- There are templates for everything: The Book has a long appendix with templates for every conceivable action. You want to sneeze? Sorry, it has to be approved first. Please fill in form SN123, and we’ll pass on your request to the appropriate committee for review. Expect to hear from us in a week or so.
- Signatures / Approvals for everything: This is a particularly pathological variant of the well known, “Responsibility without authority” challenge that project managers face. Here, in addition to the lack of authority, you also can’t use informal channels to get things done because you need to have a paper trail to prove authorisation.
- Every action is over-deliberated: Is every project action re-visited and re-analysed ad-nauseum? If so, your project’s suffering from process sclerosis (a close cousin of analysis paralysis), wherein mindless application of process slows progress to a crawl.
- Everything is cast in stone: You want to do some things in a different way? Sorry, that’s not possible. The methodology has a prescription for every conceivable project action. No exceptions.
- Project management is a bureaucratic exercise: Project managers in methodology heavy organisations often end up becoming bureaucrats who spend most of their time fulfilling the requirements of the methodology. This leaves them with little time to actually manage their projects. Methodology has become an end in itself. Good luck getting anything done – you’ll need it.
Lest I leave you with the impression that I’m completely anti-methodology, let me assure you that I’m not. I’m a great fan of appropriate, well-considered use of project management processes. What do I mean by that? Well, many years ago a project management guru told me that every process employed in a project should be tailored to to that particular project’s needs and circumstances. Note his emphasis on the singular; each project is unique (by definition!) and must be treated so. Project management processes used in a project should be fit for purpose.
So I end with this thought: don’t let your organisation be blinded by methodology. Instead, insist that project management tools and techniques be used appropriately, in a manner that illuminates the way ahead on particular projects.


This is SO true! I’ve tried to teach project managers that the methodology is only the framework – skeleton – upon which to hang the actual work. In other words, it’s the outline for the project and the PM has to fill in the details so that the project is successful. Thanks for posting this. You can see some of my PM ideas on my blog at http://shipwreckedproject.com.
LikeLike
Diana Lindstrom
April 30, 2008 at 5:40 am
[…] practised is that the focus is on process rather than success. I’ve alluded to this in an earlier post, in which I drew an analogy between the fixation on process and being blinded by a light. Thus […]
LikeLike
The means, not the end « Eight to Late
August 11, 2008 at 7:38 am
[…] Original article can be found at https://eight2late.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/blinded-by-the-light-when-project-management-methodology-…. […]
LikeLike
When Project Management Methodology Matters More Than Project Success - PM Hut
August 12, 2008 at 7:36 pm
[…] fault here – most do emphasise that they provide guidelines not recipes. As I have mentioned in an earlier post, this is largely a problem of our own making. To paraphrase the Bard: The fault, dear Brutus, is […]
LikeLike
On the role of processes in project management « Eight to Late
September 6, 2008 at 3:23 pm
[…] we manage projects. Practices recommended by a particular methodology or authority are sometimes followed without critical analysis or introspection. So the next time you invoke a tool, technique or practice – stop for a minute and reflect on […]
LikeLike
On the emotions evoked by project management artefacts « Eight to Late
May 29, 2009 at 5:39 am
[…] of this blog may have noted my leanings towards the “people side” of project management (see this post , for example). Now, that’s not to say that I don’t use methodologies and processes. On […]
LikeLike
Dialogue Mapping: a book review « Eight to Late
June 4, 2009 at 10:41 pm
[…] of this blog may have noted my leanings towards the “people side” of project management (see this post , for example). Now, that’s not to say that I don’t use methodologies and processes. On the […]
LikeLike
NextNow Member Blog » Jeff Conklin’s Dialogue Mapping: a book review
June 5, 2009 at 7:27 pm
[…] another post I pointed out that project management methodologies are sometime implemented wholesale, without […]
LikeLike
Project execution: efficiency versus learning « Eight to Late
November 30, 2010 at 12:39 pm